Just Sociology

Artificial Wombs: A Revolutionary Solution for Gender Equality?

Shulamith Firestone was an American feminist philosopher who argued that the biological fact of childbirth is the primary cause of gender inequality. Firestone believed that the physical disadvantage experienced by women during childbirth and their subsequent dependency on men fundamentally subordinates women, leading to unequal relationships between the genders.

In this article, we will examine Firestone’s argument and the need for the artificial womb to bring about gender equality. Additionally, we will discuss the characteristics of biological families and their relationships, including the sexual class system as the basis for other class systems.

Biological fact of childbirth causes gender inequality

Firestone argued that childbirth is a biological disadvantage experienced by women, and that this disadvantage leads to gender inequality. The physical and emotional demands associated with childbirth place women in a position of biological dependence on men.

For instance, pregnant women require support from their partners, family or friends to cater for their needs since they are in a vulnerable state. Additionally, women may be forced to have fewer job opportunities or take a break from work to cater to the needs of their newborn.

By being in such positions of disadvantage, women become more dependent on their male partners and become subordinated as a result. Firestone maintained that this physical disadvantage creates conditions that are oppressive to women and leads to unequal relationships between the genders.

Need for artificial womb for gender equality

Firestone believed that an artificial womb would lead to gender equality by eliminating the unique differences between men and women that arise from biological limitations associated with childbirth. The artificial womb would allow both men and women to reproduce without depending on one another.

Since neither gender would be at a disadvantage, they would enjoy equal relationships. The artificial womb would also eliminate the concern for pregnancies that harm a woman’s health since the fetus could be removed from the woman’s body and placed in the artificial womb for it to grow and be birthed without compromising the well-being of the mother.

It is worth noting that Firestone’s theory of using artificial wombs is still being studied, and there are no established methods for utilizing them.

Characteristics of the Biological Family

Firestone believed that biological families inherently create unequal relationships between parents and their children. For instance, parents have power over their children since they provide for them and decide how their children will be brought up.

On the other hand, children rely on their parents to survive and therefore have no alternative than to conform to their parent’s wishes. Firestone suggested that this unequal power dynamic creates a disadvantage for children since they are forced to operate within the confines of their parent’s beliefs and social norms without the freedom to act independently.

Additionally, Firestone argued that the dependence of humans on their biological families creates inequalities in society. Families that have more resources are better equipped to support their children and provide them with the opportunities they need to succeed.

At the same time, children who come from families that have fewer resources are disadvantaged regarding resources such as education, finance, and medical care. Firestone suggested that such advantages and disadvantages that individuals encounter as a result of their biological families can be viewed as a form of “biological determinism” that sustains social inequality.

Sexual class system as the basis for all other class systems

Firestone believed that the sexual class system is the basis for all other class systems in society. The sexual class system refers to the power dynamics between men and women and the inequalities that arise from those dynamics.

Firestone argued that gender power inequalities have a profound influence on other systems such as the economic class system. she showed that men are viewed as having power in society due to the sexual class system, which translates to economic power.

On the other hand, women, being subordinate in the sexual class system, are disadvantaged economically in their relationship with men. Firestone argued that solving the sexual class system inequality would have a ripple effect on other forms of inequality, including economic inequality.

She believed that by creating equal relationships between men and women, other forms of inequality would be eroded. Firestone’s theory posits that economic inequality between men and women is an extension of the gender inequalities perpetuated by the sexual class system.


In conclusion, Firestone’s argument on gender inequality resulting from biological differences between men and women remains relevant in contemporary society. Although her proposal of utilizing artificial wombs is still a subject of research, her ideas about the limitations of biological families creating dependence and disadvantage are valid.

Similarly, her assertion that the sexual class system forms the foundation of all class systems and her call for its elimination provides an avenue for feminist theory and gender equality. Gender inequalities can only be corrected by finding new ways to eliminate dependence caused by biological limitations, and a radical reexamination of society, according to Firestone, is one of the ways that the society can correct gender inequalities.


Women’s Control over Reproduction

Firestone argued that women’s control over reproduction was critical to gender equality. She believed that women should have the right to choose if and when to have children.

This control would allow them to avoid unwanted pregnancies and prioritize other aspects of their lives, such as education and career goals. In this section, we will discuss contraception as a step towards gender equality and the need for even more control over reproduction.

Contraception as a step towards gender equality

Contraception has long been regarded as a significant factor in women’s control over their reproductive health. By enabling women to choose if and when to have children, contraception provides them with the ability to prioritize their career goals and personal lives without the fear of an unwanted pregnancy.

Additionally, contraception as a tool for women’s reproductive health was instrumental in the feminist movement of the 1960s and 1970s, as it enabled women to control their sexuality and reproductive destiny. Contraception empowers women by providing them with choices about their pregnancy and childbirth.

Under the control of women, the decision, to some extent, removes the unwanted childbearing from the influence of men. This move, which has led women to choose when to bear children and, therefore, allowed them to plan their lives, is a significant step towards the achievement of gender equality.

By allowing women to take control of their own bodies, their personal choices, career goals and aspirations, contraceptive methods, including pills, patches, intrauterine devices, an injection in a woman’s arm, and surgical sterilization methods such as tubal ligation, continue to be an effective tool for gender equality.

Need for Even More Control Over Reproduction

While contraception remains crucial, women need even more control over their reproductive health to achieve gender equality. For instance, women with physical disabilities are often unable to use traditional methods of birth control, making them vulnerable to unwanted pregnancies.

Likewise, women who experience pregnancy-related complications, such as life-threatening illnesses or conditions, may likewise be unable to use traditional forms of contraception or may require more sophisticated and efficient methods. In such circumstances, an artificial womb may be the only option for these women, as recommended by Firestone.

Individuals who have conditions such as cardiac disease, pulmonary hypertension, kidney disease, lupus, cancer, HIV, and some forms of arthritis may require specialized reproductive health care. As such, there is a need to research on and develop specialized artificial wombs that cater to women with such unique conditions.

The development and use of such artificial wombs will not only provide women with the means to bear children despite their physical challenges but also will promote gender equality by putting men and women on an equal footing when it comes to reproductive health. Evaluations of Firestone’s Theory

Firestone’s theory on gender inequality remains relevant today, but it is also not without criticisms.

In this section, we will discuss the limitations of Firestone’s theory in explaining variations in gender power inequality and the debatability of the need for artificial wombs for gender equality. Theory’s Limitation in Explaining Variations in Gender Power Inequality

Firestone’s theory, which relies on physiological differences and the limitations imposed on women due to childbirth, fails to explain variations in gender power inequality.

For example, power dynamics between men and women vary in different societies and cultures. Some traditional societies have prominent female roles and social structures that allow women to wield significant power.

Additionally, contemporary societies are grappling with a generational shift in gender equality, whereby younger generations hold more gender-neutral views on power and gender roles than their predecessors. Firestone’s theory may be limited in explaining variations in gender power inequality in different societies, but it does provide insight into the structural factors that give rise to such inequalities.

Understanding those interwoven structural factors is essential in creating effective interventions and strategies for gender equality.

Debatability of Need for Artificial Wombs for Gender Equality

Firestone’s call for an artificial womb may be debatable. While a technological solution to gender inequality may seem attractive, it is unclear if the artificial womb is the best option for achieving gender equality.

Some feminists argue that placing too much emphasis on technological solutions may misdirect attention from structural factors that perpetuate gender inequality. Additionally, Firestone’s theory on dependency solely on childbirth and pregnancy may be narrow.

It does not consider the many other ways women are dependent on men and how such dependencies affect gender equality. Women’s reliance on men for societal and economic support is only one aspect of gender inequality.

Firestone’s call for a complete overhaul of the gender power dynamics in the society is essential in addressing the various problems of gender inequality.


Firestone’s theories provide a critical foundation for understanding gender inequality, and her call for an artificial womb provides insight into potential solutions for achieving gender equality. While logistical and practical problems may make the artificial womb a far-off solution, evaluating her theories with a critical lens also provides insight into addressing broader issues of gender inequality.

Contraception plays a crucial role in advancing women’s control over their reproductive health, and creating more opportunities for women to make personal choices and plan their lives freely is a vital component of gender equality.


Artificial Wombs

The concept of artificial wombs has drawn attention and sparked debate amongst scholars and the general public alike. In this section, we will discuss the development of artificial wombs for premature babies and further readings for evaluating artificial wombs from a gender equality standpoint.

Development of Artificial Wombs for Premature Babies

The development of artificial wombs for premature babies is a crucial step in advancing medical science and may have significant implications for neonatal care. Premature babies are defined as babies born before 37 weeks of gestation, and their fragile development requires specialized treatments and care to ensure their survival.

The conventional treatment for premature babies is incubation, whereby the baby’s vital organs are monitored and sustained in a regulated environment. However, even with incubation, premature babies face a high risk of developmental challenges that may result in long-term disabilities.

The development of artificial wombs for premature babies seeks to replicate the critical aspects of the womb and provide a similar environment that fosters normal development. Recent studies undertaken to test the effectiveness of artificial wombs for premature babies showed that the technology provided an adequate alternative to incubation care.

The artificial womb nourished the premature babies in a way that met their nutritional requirements, sustained their temperature and overall provided an environment that mimicked the mother’s womb. The technology is still in development, and more research is necessary to perfect the artificial womb for premature babies.

Nevertheless, the possibility of widespread use of this technology will revolutionize how we approach neonatal care, and it is a critical step in the development of advanced artificial wombs.

Further Readings for Evaluating Artificial Wombs

The idea of artificial wombs raises ethical and philosophical questions surrounding reproduction and gender equality. While Firestone proposed the use of artificial wombs as an avenue to achieve gender equality, further reading and examinations are necessary to evaluate artificial wombs from this perspective adequately.

One area of interest is the extent to which artificial wombs would conclusively provide gender equality. Articial wombs have the potential to remove the physical limitations surrounding childbirth and pregnancy that contribute to gender inequality.

However, it is essential to examine whether the technology will remove culturally constructed roles and barriers, which perpetuate gender inequality. Additionally, the cost and accessibility of artificial wombs may also give rise to further societal divides.

Moreover, from an ethical perspective, utilizing artificial wombs raises a plethora of issues that need to be considered. With the development and feasibility of this technology, issues such as the legal definition of parenthood, sterilization of the womb, and societal constructs surrounding reproduction must appropriately be analyzed.

Understanding the ethical dimension of artificial wombs is essential if society is to weigh the benefits of the technology against the potential risks. Another area of consideration is the potential impact of artificial wombs on the overall quality of reproductive rights.

While artificial wombs transfer the burden of labor from the body of women, this may also encourage further societal expectations that perpetuate traditional gender roles. Additionally, issues such as access to the technology and the potential consequences of men absconding from their parental responsibilities must be examined.

Overall, further readings and evaluations are necessary to better understand the implications of artificial wombs for gender equality and other broader ethical concerns related to their deployment.


The development of artificial wombs for premature babies is an ongoing journey that has the potential to revolutionize neonatal care. The technology provides an opportunity to develop more innovative approaches to assist premature babies and their overall development.

However, the technology also raises ethical concerns that need to be examined extensively. In the broader area of gender equality, artificial wombs present a technological solution that may provide an avenue towards greater equity.

Nevertheless, society must be cautious in how it approaches such technology, and such considerations should be undertaken with social implications and ethical considerations in mind. By recognizing these concerns and undertaking critical evaluations, society can develop technologies that promote gender equality whilst protecting broader ethical concerns.

In conclusion, this article discussed the theories of Shulamith Firestone, the biological family, women’s control over reproduction, and artificial wombs. Firestone’s argument that the biological fact of childbirth causes gender inequality and her proposal for an artificial womb continues to draw attention and spark debate amongst scholars and the general public alike.

Furthermore, this article highlights the need for women’s control over their reproductive health, including the use of contraception and the significance of the development of artificial wombs for premature babies. Finally, this article discussed the need for further evaluations of artificial wombs and the potential ethical and societal implications of widespread deployment.

It is essential to continue to critically evaluate this technology and the broader implications of gender inequality to ensure that artificial wombs and other technologies promote equity while recognizing broader ethical considerations and societal impacts. FAQs:

Q: What is Firestone’s argument about childbirth and gender inequality?

A: Firestone argued that the physical disadvantage experienced by women during childbirth and their subsequent dependency on men fundamentally subordinates women, leading to unequal relationships between the genders. Q: What is the significance of women’s control over reproduction?

A: Women’s control over reproduction is critical to gender equality as it enables women to choose if and when to have children, prioritize other aspects of their lives, and avoid unwanted pregnancies. Q: What is the development of artificial wombs for premature babies?

A: The development of artificial wombs aims to replicate the critical aspects of the womb and provides an environment that fosters normal development for premature babies in neonatal care circumstances. Q: What are the further evaluations needed for artificial wombs?

A: Further evaluations on artificial wombs need to examine their implications for gender equality and other ethical considerations related to their deployment. Q: What are the ethical considerations surrounding artificial wombs?

A: Ethical considerations related to the deployment of artificial wombs include legal definitions of parenthood, sterilization of the womb, societal constructs surrounding reproduction, and access to the technology.

Popular Posts