Just Sociology

Closing the Gap: Understanding Educational Achievement Differences

Inequalities in educational achievement have been extensively studied over the past few decades. There is a growing understanding that these differences are not just about economic and social factors but are also influenced by school culture, teacher judgments, and pupil subcultures.

Teachers’ expectations and labeling can significantly affect pupils’ educational outcomes. Pupil subcultures that promote anti-school attitudes can also contribute to underachievement.

The purpose of this article is to examine the complex theories of educational achievement differences and their implications.

Educational Achievement Differences

Teacher Labelling

Teacher labeling is a micro process that can have a significant impact on pupils’ educational achievement. Middle-class teachers tend to have an ideal pupil in mind compliant, well-behaved, and academically successful.

Pupils who exhibit these qualities receive positive labels and are more likely to succeed. In contrast, pupils who do not meet the ideal pupil qualities often receive negative labels and are more likely to underachieve.

This labeling process can become a self-fulfilling prophecy, where the pupil’s performance matches the teacher’s expectations. John Abraham and David Gilborn have investigated this process; however, there is limited evidence of this phenomenon.

Some critics see this labeling process as determinism, which assumes that pupils are passive and incapable of challenging negative stereotypes.

Pupil Subcultures

Pupil subcultures are in-school processes that can influence pupils’ educational outcomes. Pro-school subcultures promote academic success, and anti-school subcultures promote non-academic activities or subcultures that valorize underachievement.

In pupil subcultures, positive attitudes toward learning and academic success are affirmed, while negative attitudes are stigmatized. Working-class boys tend to participate in anti-school subcultures, where education is seen as feminized and effeminate.

Middle-class boys often participate in pro-school subcultures, where education is seen as a legitimate and valuable pursuit. Current research suggests that hegemonic masculinity and verbal abuse often accompany anti-school subcultures.

Tony Sewell has conducted extensive research in this area and has developed an alternative model of masculinity that promotes academic success.

Banding and Streaming

Banding and streaming are methods of allocating pupils to different levels of the education system according to their academic ability. However, this categorization of pupils can create disadvantages for working-class and minority-group children.

Banding or streaming, especially in lower sets, can become a form of educational triage, where these pupils receive less support and resources. The ways in which pupils are grouped also impact their curriculums, which can be narrower and less challenging than those given to higher-streamed students.

Black Caribbean children, in particular, have been identified as a group that performs poorly within these systems.

The Ethnocentric Curriculum

The ethnocentric curriculum refers to educational materials and textbooks that reflect the dominant group, which is usually white majority culture. This approach means that ethnic-minority students do not see their cultural experience reflected in the curriculum, which can lead to feelings of being caught up in a multicultural society.

These students may also encounter racism in the classroom, which can further exacerbate their feelings of alienation. While there have been efforts to make the curriculum reflect more diverse experiences, critics suggest that this approach addresses minor issues and does little to address the deep-seated problem of cultural bias.

Interactionism

Interactionism is a theoretical perspective that views human behavior as a result of complex interactions between individuals and their environment. This perspective is distinguished by its micro-level analysis, focusing on the everyday actions and responses of individuals.

Teacher Labelling

From an interactionist perspective, labeling is a process that occurs in social interaction. In the classroom, teachers use verbal and non-verbal cues to signal to pupils how they perceive them, and pupils respond to these clues in turn.

This microprocess can result in significant educational outcomes, as discussed in subtopic 1.1. Interactionists also recognize that labeling is not a one-way street; pupils may challenge negative labeling, and teachers may adjust their perceptions based on pupils’ behavior.

Pupil Subcultures

Interactionists view pupil subcultures as a product of the negotiation between pupils and their environment. The ways in which pupils interact with teachers, peers, and their curriculum shape their attitudes toward education.

Teacher expectations can affect how pupils view themselves and their abilities, and pupils can either resist or embrace these expectations. Similarly, the curriculum and pedagogy can either affirm or deny pupils’ cultural experiences, leading them to accept or resist the educational system.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, this article has explored the complex theories of educational achievement differences and interactionism’s implications. Teachers’ labeling and pupil subcultures have been shown to be crucial factors in pupils’ academic success or underachievement.

Banding and streaming and the ethnocentric curriculum have also been linked to disadvantages for working-class and minority-group pupils. From an interactionist perspective, these processes are seen as the result of complex interactions between individuals and their environment.

While the challenges of addressing these issues are significant, acknowledging these complexities is an essential first step toward addressing educational inequalities. Expansion:

Racism and Institutional Racism

Racism/ Institutional Racism

Pakistani and Bangladeshi students often face institutional racism and discrimination within the education system. The exclusion of these students from mainstream education is a significant issue.

While many schools have policies against racism, these policies often do not protect students from racist abuse. In some cases, teachers might perpetuate stereotypes or engage in practices that reinforce racist ideas.

To counteract this problem, teacher training programs need to incorporate anti-racist practices into their curriculums. Additionally, measures such as zero-tolerance policies and stricter disciplinary actions can help to eradicate this issue.

In institutional racism, policies and practices may create and maintain systemic and lasting advantages for the dominant group while placing ethnic-minority groups at a disadvantage. Institutional racism is a type of racism that is embedded in social and political institutions, policies, and practices.

In education, this can be seen in the underachievement of Pakistani and Bangladeshi students who are often grouped in lower sets based on perceived ethnic and cultural backgrounds. To eliminate institutional racism in education, policies must be put in place to address the issue.

Evaluations

Home factors

Home factors have a significant impact on pupils’ academic performance. Material deprivation is one of the most critical factors.

For example, pupils from low-income households may have fewer resources such as space, study materials, or technology, compared to those from wealthier households. These hidden costs create a disadvantage for lower-income pupils.

Furthermore, working-class parents may have less time to devote to their children’s education as they may be working multiple jobs to make ends meet. This lack of time and resources can lead to lack of parental involvement and support, which can negatively impact the child’s educational outcomes.

Private schools are able to exclude pupils based on family income, meaning those from disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to be able to access their education. Although there are bursaries and scholarships available, there are still hidden financial costs associated with private education.

For example, uniform and equipment. This creates disparities, which is perpetuating social inequality.

Cultural deprivation

Cultural deprivation theory posits that some pupils are lacking in the cultural capital necessary for academic success. Speech codes are an example of how language plays a role in cultural deprivation.

For example, pupils who speak with regional accents or who use non-standard English may be labeled as unintelligent or have poor language skills, leading to negative labeling. This labeling can result in underachievement as pupils are discouraged from academic pursuits.

Additionally, the hierarchy of languages taught in schools can reinforce cultural deprivation, with native English speakers being favored over those who speak other languages.

Single parent families

Single-parent families are often stigmatized and seen as disadvantageous for pupils. However, research has shown that the impact of single-parent families on a child’s education is not as significant as previously thought.

While some studies suggest that children from single-parent families are more likely to perform poorly academically and have attendance issues, other studies have found the complete opposite. Instead, the negative impact is often attributed to other factors such as working-class status or material disadvantage.

Banding and streaming, while seemingly a neutral categorization system, can disadvantage pupils from single-parent families. These pupils may lack the financial and social capital necessary to advocate for their child’s academic achievement, leading to their child being placed in a lower set.

Policy

Policy favoritism refers to educational policies that favor the middle class over the working class. Policies that allocate more resources to middle-class schools or provide incentives for middle-class families to move into specific neighborhoods can further institutionalize class and socio-economic differences.

This affects academic performances as working-class children are not getting the same educational opportunities as their wealthier counterparts. Policymakers must take a more equitable approach to education, where resources are allocated evenly across different schools, and policies are designed to benefit all students and not just one group.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, this article has expanded on the complex theories of educational achievement differences and interactionism, providing more detail on racism and institutional racism and evaluations. Pakistani and Bangladeshi students often face institutional racism and discrimination within the education system, and there is a need for policies to address this.

Home factors, cultural deprivation, single-parent families, and policy favoritism have all been shown to have an impact on pupils’ academic performance. Addressing these factors is essential to close the educational gap and ensure that all pupils have access to a quality education.

Ongoing research and policy implementation are necessary to achieve this goal. Expansion:

Conclusion

Summary

In summary, educational achievement differences are not solely based on economic or social factors but are influenced by a wide range of factors. Teacher labeling and pupil subcultures play a significant role in shaping educational outcomes.

Students who do not fit the ideal pupil qualities may receive negative labels and are more likely to underachieve, leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy. Anti-school subcultures that value non-academic activities or underachievement can promote low academic achievement.

Banding and streaming can also create disadvantages for working-class and minority-group children. Racism and institutional racism are significant factors that impact the educational experiences of Pakistani and Bangladeshi students, leading to their exclusion from mainstream education.

Home factors, including material deprivation, hidden costs, and lack of parental involvement, can lead to academic disadvantage for lower-income students. The single-parent family structure, which is often stigmatized, has not been found to have a significant impact on children’s education.

Cultural deprivation theory suggests that some pupils are lacking in the cultural capital necessary for academic success. Speech codes, language hierarchy, and other practices can contribute to the negative labeling of pupils and lead to underachievement.

Policy favoritism, which refers to educational policies that favor the middle class over the working class, further perpetuates inequality, and disadvantages working-class students. In conclusion, it is essential to acknowledge the multifaceted factors that contribute to educational achievement differences.

Ongoing research, policy implementation, and training programs can help to address these issues and create a more equitable educational system. It is vital to ensure that all students have access to high-quality education, regardless of their social or economic background, to achieve a more just and equal society.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, this article has explored the complex theories of educational achievement differences and interactionism, racism, institutional racism, evaluations, and the impact of home background. Fundamental to addressing educational inequalities, policymakers and educators need to take a more equity-focused approach, ensuring that all pupils have access to high-quality education, regardless of their social or economic background.

By addressing the subtle and overt forms of exclusion, marginalization, and bias, we can create an educational system that recognizes and values the diverse cultural experiences of pupils and promotes better educational outcomes. FAQs:

Q: What is institutional racism?

A: Institutional racism is a type of racism that is embedded in social and political institutions, policies, and practices. In education, this can be seen in the underachievement of ethnic-minority students who are often grouped in lower sets based on perceived ethnic and cultural backgrounds.

Q: What is cultural deprivation? A:

Cultural deprivation theory posits that some pupils are lacking in the cultural capital necessary for academic success.

Speech codes, language hierarchy, and other practices can contribute to the negative labeling of pupils and lead to underachievement. Q: What is the impact of home factors on educational achievement?

A: Home factors, including material deprivation, hidden costs, and lack of parental involvement, can lead to academic disadvantage for lower-income students. Q: How can policymakers and educators promote equity in education?

A: Policymakers and educators can promote equity in education by ensuring that all students have access to high-quality education, regardless of their social or economic background. This requires addressing subtle and overt forms of exclusion, marginalization, and bias.

Q: Can single-parent families have an impact on children’s education? A: While some studies suggest that children from single-parent families are more likely to perform poorly academically and have attendance issues, other studies have found the complete opposite.

Instead, the negative impact is often attributed to other factors such as working-class status or material disadvantage.

Popular Posts