Just Sociology

Comparing Poverty Rates: Understanding the Different Dimensions of Poverty in the UK

Poverty defines a state of being unable to access basic needs such as housing, food, and clothing. The United Kingdom (UK) has a multifarious economy, a robust job market, and a comprehensive welfare state, making poverty an issue that is often overlooked.

However, poverty is still prevalent in the UK, and this paper examines the statistics and definition of poverty in the UK. The article is organized into two main topics with subtopics under each to provide a more in-depth analysis.

Main topic 1: Statistics on poverty in the UK

Poverty statistics from the Social Metrics Foundation

The Social Metrics Foundation poverty rate for the year 2021 was 21%, affecting approximately 14.5 million people in the UK. Of this number, 8.5 million are working-age adults, 4.5 million are children, and one million are pension-age adults.

Moreover, 2.5 million people are trapped in persistent poverty, meaning that they have been living in poverty for three years or more.

The Social Metrics Foundation also identifies a significant impact of certain factors on poverty.

Disability, particularly in combination with rent or a mortgage, raises the risk of poverty. Furthermore, childcare costs and inescapable costs such as internet bills and school uniforms increase poverty rates.

Poverty statistics from the Government’s own data

The UK government uses low-income households and the relative poverty line as poverty indicators. In 2019-2020, 25% of children, about 4.3 million, lived below the relative poverty line.

Moreover, 2.9 million children lived in households with less than 60% of the median income after housing costs.

Housing costs are among the major contributors to poverty in the UK.

Approximately 4.1 million people are estimated to live in social housing; however, over a million households are waiting for social housing, some for years. Moreover, due to the high cost of rent, many low-income families have to choose between paying for rent or putting food on the table.

Main topic 2: Definition of poverty

Broader definition of poverty used by the Social Metrics Foundation

The Social Metrics Foundation offers a more comprehensive definition of poverty that considers the material resources that a household needs to participate fully in society. The definition is based on an individual’s disposable income or spending power after paying for essential, inescapable costs.

The definition includes a range of factors such as disability, childcare costs, rental, mortgage, and sleeping rough. Childcare costs significantly impact poverty rates, particularly for households with young children.

The Social Metrics Foundation identifies childcare as an inescapable cost that drives poverty rates, especially when parents are unable to work due to caring responsibilities.

Comparison of poverty definitions

Relative poverty, measured by income and expenditure, is the most commonly used measure of poverty. It refers to households with incomes below a set percentage of the median income in their country.

In the UK, households whose income falls below 60% of the median income are considered to be below the poverty line. However, the relative poverty line has been criticized for categorizing individuals with extremely low income but still having access to basic needs as poor, while others with higher income but higher expenses go unnoticed.

The broader definition proposed by the Social Metrics Foundation considers inescapable costs that individuals cannot avoid, such as childcare, as poverty-contributing factors. This definition aligns with the public’s perspective that poverty is more than just lacking food and shelter.

Conclusion

In conclusion, poverty remains a significant issue in the UK, affecting millions of people, including children and families. The Social Metrics Foundation offers a more comprehensive definition of poverty that considers additional components such as inescapable costs that the relative poverty line does not account for.

Baby steps are being taken by the UK government to mitigate poverty through policies aimed at reducing child poverty and increasing the availability of social housing.Poverty rates are an essential consideration for policymakers who must create policies and strategies aimed at mitigating its impact. Poverty takes various forms and affects different demographic groups.

As such, measuring and comparing poverty rates from different sources and methodologies is crucial in understanding the nature and extent of poverty. This article explores poverty rate comparisons and their validity.

Comparison of poverty rates

Persistent poverty rates from different sources

The Social Metrics Foundation and the Office for National Statistics (ONS) are two institutions that provide insights into poverty and have different methods of measuring it. Both organizations have different poverty line thresholds used to identify impoverished individuals.

The ONS sets the threshold at 60% of the median equivalized household income. The Social Metrics Foundation, however, measures poverty based on the severity and persistence of poverty.

The Persistence Analysis conducted by The Social Metrics Foundation identified that more than 2.5 million people in the UK are in persistent poverty, meaning that they have experienced poverty for three years or more. This figure accounts for 18% of people in poverty.

The Social Metrics Foundation also highlighted that single parents and those from Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME) backgrounds are more likely to be affected by persistent poverty. The ONS, on the other hand, identifies poverty rates based on households with an income close to, or below, the relative poverty line.

The ONS report shows that in 2019-2020, the number of people in the UK living in relative poverty was estimated at 14.5 million, a slightly higher figure than the Social Metrics Foundation’s poverty rate of 21%.

Validity of poverty measurement

The validity of poverty measurement is central to poverty rate comparisons. Measuring poverty requires a sound methodology that is reliable and valid across different studies.

A large panel is usually seen as one of the most reliable methods of poverty measurement. This methodology enables researchers to follow individuals and households over time and examine their poverty status using different indicators.

Another aspect is the representativeness of the sample whose poverty is being measured. For poverty measurement to be valid, the sample must be representative of the total population.

The quality of poverty data is also essential, and cross-checking data sources is a means of ensuring accurate representations of the circumstances of the poor. The relative poverty line is often used as a reliable poverty measurement method.

This method measures the proportion of people in a country whose income is below a set percentage of the median income. However, as noted earlier, the relative poverty line has limitations when it comes to defining poverty.

The relative income measure does not consider other essential elements that make up poverty, such as access to food, housing, and education. The measure also does not account for regional differences in living costs, making it less relevant in areas with higher living costs.

For a poverty measure to be valid, it must consider multidimensional aspects that contribute to poverty. Thus, measures that include inescapable costs, such as rent, childcare, and disability, are sound methods of determining poverty rates.

For instance, the Social Metrics Foundation’s poverty measurement considers such inescapable costs and, therefore, provides a more valid representation of poverty in comparison to the relative poverty line. Moreover, the measures used to define and measure poverty are subject to political influence, and the numbers assigned as poverty thresholds can vary depending on policy objectives.

The political influence can lead to changes in the definition of poverty and skew results, making comparisons difficult.

Conclusion

Comparing poverty rates is fundamental in developing a better understanding of poverty in the UK. However, the measures used to determine poverty play a significant role in the validity of the numbers.

The relative poverty line has limitations, and other measures, including inescapable costs, must be included to ensure valid poverty measurement. The comparison of poverty rates between The Social Metrics Foundation and the ONS highlights the importance of considering the methodology used to produce the estimates.

Full representation of the circumstances of the poor must guide any measure of poverty. In conclusion, poverty is still a significant issue in the UK, affecting millions of people, including children and families.

The above-discussed topics reveal that poverty has different dimensions and that measuring poverty is crucial to understanding its various forms and extent. Measures used to determine poverty play a significant role in the validity of the numbers.

Therefore, valid poverty measurement, and comparison of poverty rates are fundamental in developing an understanding of poverty in the UK.

FAQs

1. What is the poverty rate in the UK gained from government data?

Ans: According to the government’s data, in 2019-2020, approximately 4.3 million children and 14.5 million people lived below the relative poverty line. 2.

What are inescapable costs? Ans: Inescapable costs include rent/mortgage expenses, heating, electricity, childcare, disability, and other payments that the respondent cannot avoid spending.

3. What is the meaning of persistent poverty?

Ans: Persistent poverty refers to poverty experienced over three or more years. 4.

What are the limitations of using the relative poverty line to measure poverty? Ans: The relative poverty line does not account for other essential elements that make up poverty, such as access to food, housing, and education, and regional differences in living cost, making it less relevant in areas with higher living costs.

5. Why is poverty measurement considered a significant aspect of developing policies?

Ans: Understanding the extent of poverty and its various forms is crucial in developing policies that alleviate poverty and improve the standard of living of the impoverished.

Popular Posts