Just Sociology

Examining Education: Universal Free School Meals Social Class and Neoliberal Policy

Universal Free School Meals (UFSM) is a policy aimed at providing all children with access to healthy meals during school hours, regardless of their socio-economic backgrounds. The policy has been implemented in different countries around the world to address issues such as poor academic performance, stigma of poverty, and health concerns.

This article will examine the benefits and challenges of UFSM with a focus on academic performance and the cost implications of implementing the policy.

Benefits of Universal Free School Meals

Studies have shown that UFSM has a positive impact on academic performance, particularly for children from low-income families. Research conducted by the Labour government in the UK found that children who were provided with free school meals performed better academically compared to those who didn’t receive free school meals.

The trials conducted in areas with high deprivation showed an improvement in academic performance of up to two months for children that received free school meals. This shows that UFSM not only improves the quality of diet of the children but also has an impact on academic outcomes.

Another benefit of UFSM is that it creates a culture of school where all children are included, regardless of their socio-economic backgrounds. Providing all children with access to free school meals reduces the stigma of poverty and promotes a sense of equality and inclusivity in schools.

This helps to create a positive environment for learning which can contribute to better academic performance.

Cost and Savings of Universal Free School Meals

The cost of UFSM may seem high at first, but research has shown that it can be cost-effective in the long run. In the UK, the cost of implementing UFSM was estimated at around 130 million pounds per year.

However, research by the Children’s Society showed that UFSM could save an average family 440 pounds per year. This means that families who would otherwise be unable to afford school meals for their children would be able to save money.

Additionally, it is estimated that UFSM would benefit around 270,000 children who are currently not receiving free school meals. Furthermore, UFSM has been shown to have a positive impact on the economy by reducing the burden of healthcare costs associated with poor diet.

Poor diet has been identified as one of the biggest drags on the economy due to the long-term sickness it causes. By providing children with healthy meals, UFSM reduces the risk of long-term health problems associated with poor diet, which ultimately reduces healthcare costs.

Opposition to Universal Free School Meals

Despite the benefits associated with UFSM, there has been opposition to the policy, particularly from those who adhere to neoliberal ideology. The Tory government in the UK, for example, has been criticized for promoting a culture of individualism that prioritizes reducing public spending over caring for the poorest children.

Concerns have also been raised about the idea of universal benefits, whereby benefits are provided to everyone regardless of their socio-economic status. Some argue that this approach would not be targeted enough to those who need it most.

However, it is important to note that UFSM is a policy aimed at caring for the poorest children, and its benefits extend beyond the immediate effects on academic performance. By addressing issues such as stigma and health concerns, UFSM creates a more equal and inclusive society, which can contribute to long-term benefits in areas such as social mobility and economic growth.

Improvement in Academic Performance due to Universal Free School Meals

As previously mentioned, UFSM has been shown to have a positive impact on academic performance. A study conducted by local authorities in the UK found that introducing UFSM resulted in an improvement in exam results and attendance rates.

The study also found that, on average, children who received free school meals achieved lower results in exams than those who didn’t receive free school meals. Therefore, UFSM can help to reduce the inequality gap between children from different socio-economic backgrounds.

Moreover, UFSM has been shown to improve the cognitive function of children, which can lead to better academic performance. A review of studies conducted by the World Health Organisation found that providing children with a healthy diet can improve their cognitive abilities, memory, and attention span.

Therefore, UFSM can play an important role in ensuring that children are able to achieve their full academic potential.

Link between Poor Diet and Long-Term Sickness

Poor diet has been identified as one of the main contributors to long-term sickness, which can have a negative impact on academic performance. Children who have a poor diet are more likely to miss school due to sickness and are less likely to perform well in exams.

Moreover, poor diet can lead to long-term health problems such as obesity, diabetes and heart disease, which can have significant economic consequences. Therefore, UFSM can play an important role in promoting good health and reducing the burden of healthcare costs associated with poor diet.

By providing children with healthy meals, UFSM can reduce the risk of long-term health problems and contribute to a healthier, more productive society.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Universal Free School Meals is a policy that has been shown to have a positive impact on academic performance, health, and social inclusion. While there may be concerns about the cost and the idea of universal benefits, these issues should be considered in the context of the long-term benefits that UFSM can provide.

Furthermore, the link between poor diet and long-term sickness highlights the importance of ensuring that all children have access to healthy meals. Overall, UFSM has the potential to contribute to a more equal, healthier, and more prosperous society.Social class and education are two issues that have been closely linked for many years.

Material deprivation is a major factor that influences educational achievement, which can have long term impacts on an individual’s lifetime income. In addition, education has a role to play in reducing societal inequality.

However, neoliberal education policy has been criticized for prioritizing profit over social welfare, and for perpetuating social class differences in education. This article will examine the impact of material deprivation on educational achievement, the role of education in reducing inequality, and the harms of neoliberal education policy.

Impact of Material Deprivation on Educational Achievement

Social class differences play a major role in explaining the differences in educational achievement. Children from low-income families are more likely to experience material deprivation which can negatively affect their educational attainment.

Material deprivation can manifest in many different ways, such as poor quality living conditions, inadequate access to physical and digital resources, and poor quality diets. These experiences can lead to poor academic performance in school and other areas.

Effective policies aimed at reducing the effects of material deprivation can help to improve educational outcomes for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. For example, in the UK, the Pupil Premium policy provides additional funding to schools for every child from a low-income background.

This helps schools to provide additional resources such as access to digital resources, extra-curricular activities, and mentoring programs. Evidence has shown that such policies can improve educational outcomes for children from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Role of Education in Reducing Inequality

Education has a significant role to play in reducing societal inequality. A study conducted in Sweden found that education and income were strongly correlated, with academic achievement being one of the major predictors of lifetime income.

The study found that students from richer backgrounds had higher levels of academic achievement and higher lifetime income compared to those from poorer backgrounds. This highlights the importance of providing equal access to education for all children, regardless of socio-economic background.

In addition, education has the potential to overcome social class differences by providing access to opportunities and resources that are not otherwise available. For example, education can promote social mobility by providing equal opportunities for individuals from different backgrounds to pursue career paths that were previously closed off to them.

Education can also contribute to a more equal and fair society by promoting cultural diversity, inclusivity, and social responsibility.

Opposition to Universal Benefits and Neoliberal Ideology

Neoliberal education policy has been criticized for its focus on individualism and the free market over social welfare. This is exemplified in the opposition to universal benefits in education, where benefits are provided to all children regardless of socio-economic status.

Nick Clegg, a former UK politician, argued that universal benefits in education should be cut to reduce public spending. Similarly, Michael Gove, a former UK Education Secretary, implemented policies that prioritized the privatization of education over social welfare.

However, it is important to recognize that universal benefits are an important means of caring for the poorest children. By providing equal access to education and its benefits, this can contribute to a more equal and inclusive society.

There is also evidence to suggest that policies aimed at reducing material deprivation, like universal benefits, can improve educational outcomes for children from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Harms of Neoliberal Education Policy

The continued implementation of neoliberal education policy can have detrimental effects on social class differences in education. This is because such policies can reinforce existing inequalities, rather than address them.

For example, by focusing on profit over social welfare, neoliberal education policies can lead to the segregation of children from richer and poorer backgrounds, thereby perpetuating social class differences. Furthermore, neoliberal education policy can lead to the commodification and privatization of education, where educational institutions become businesses whose primary aim is to generate profit.

This can lead to a reduction in the quality of education, as educators are forced to prioritize financial outcomes over educational outcomes. As a result, educational institutions may be less likely to invest in resources and services that improve academic outcomes for students.

Conclusion

Social class and education are closely linked and are hugely important issues affecting society today. Material deprivation is a major factor that influences educational achievement, and policies aimed at reducing its effects can improve educational outcomes for children from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Education also has a role to play in reducing societal inequality by promoting social mobility, inclusivity, and cultural diversity. However, neoliberal education policy has been criticized for prioritizing profit over social welfare, which can perpetuate social class differences in education while harming its outcomes.

Overall, it is important for policymakers to prioritize equity and social welfare in the development of education policy. In conclusion, this article has explored the complexities of various topics related to education, including Universal Free School Meals, social class and education, and neoliberal education policy.

The article has emphasized the importance of education in reducing inequality and promoting inclusivity, while examining the potential impact of policy decisions on education outcomes. As policymakers continue to navigate these issues, it is essential to prioritize the well-being of students, regardless of their socio-economic status, and to focus on policies that promote equitable access to quality education.

FAQs:

1) What is Universal Free School Meals? Universal Free School Meals (UFSM) is a policy aimed at providing all children with access to healthy meals during school hours, regardless of socio-economic backgrounds.

2) How does social class impact education? Children from low-income families are more likely to experience material deprivation which can negatively affect their educational attainment, leading to social class differences in education.

3) What is neoliberal education policy? Neoliberal education policy is a policy that prioritizes profit and the free market over social welfare and equity in education, potentially perpetuating social class differences.

4) How can education reduce societal inequality? Education has a significant role to play in reducing societal inequality by promoting social mobility, inclusivity, and cultural diversity, providing equal access to opportunities and resources regardless of socio-economic backgrounds.

5) What are the benefits of Universal Free School Meals? UFSM promotes inclusivity and reduces the stigma of poverty, creates a positive environment for learning, improves academic performance, and reduces healthcare costs associated with poor diet.

6) Why is reducing material deprivation important in education? Reducing material deprivation is important in education as children from low-income families are more likely to experience poverty, which negatively affects their academic performance and lifetime income.

7) Can neoliberal education policies be harmful? Yes, neoliberal education policies can harm education outcomes by perpetuating social class differences, reducing quality of education, and promoting the privatization and commodification of education institutions over social welfare.

Popular Posts