Just Sociology

Media’s Marginalisation of Alternative Perspectives: Impact on Inequality

In today’s world, the media has a powerful role in shaping public opinion and highlighting issues that are relevant to society. Through its various mediums, the media can influence the public’s perception of events, people, and organizations.

In this article, we explore the concept of agenda setting and its various dimensions, including limited range of questions asked by the media and Marxist analysis of agenda setting. Further, we provide examples of agenda setting with a focus on violent political protests, the drama of the London riots, and the promotion of economic growth without questioning its benefits.

Agenda-Setting:

Agenda-setting is a process by which the media determines what issues will be considered important in the public domain. It is the media’s ability to determine the relevance and significance of news items, thereby influencing people’s views on society’s issues.

Through agenda setting, the media provides a framework within which questions about social problems can be discussed, and the perspectives and angles of these issues can be explored. However, agenda setting is not an objective process.

It can be influenced by media organizations’ interests and objectives, the power structures of the society, and the values and beliefs of the media personnel. The media has a limited range of questions that it can ask, depending on the news values and ideological control possessed by the media.

For instance, if the media is owned by a particular interest group, it may only report on news items that are favorable to that group, disregarding other issues that require attention. Limited Range of Questions asked by the Media:

The media’s news values and interests often result in a limited range of questions asked by the media.

For instance, if the media is interested in investigating crime-related issues, it may disregard other significant issues such as environmental degradation. In this regard, the media’s limited range of questions may result in ignoring issues of concern to the larger public.

The media’s limited range of questions also limits the exploration of various perspectives and angles on issues. This is because the media may only focus on the dominant view, ignoring other perspectives that may provide more comprehensive solutions to the issue at hand.

Thus, the media’s limited range of questions inhibits critical thinking and impairs society’s ability to make informed decisions about pressing social issues. Marxist Analysis of Agenda Setting:

Marxist analysis of agenda setting argues that the media serves the interests of the capitalist class by presenting news items that favour their interests.

The media is said to be influenced by the capitalist class through its ownership structure, and this makes it difficult for the media to represent the wider interests of society. The media’s focus is capitalist class interests, and this perpetuates inequalities in society.

In addition, Marxist analysis argues that the media’s news values and power structures determine the issues that the media considers important. It is said that the media’s news values reflect the interests of the capitalist class and not the wider interests of society.

Therefore, the media’s ability to determine what issues are considered important in society is influenced by the capitalist class’s interests and values. Examples of Agenda Setting:

Focusing on Violent Aspects of Political Protests:

During political protests, the media often focuses on the violence and clashes between protesters and law enforcement officers.

The media frames the issue as being violent, portraying protesters as irrational and lawless. The media often overlooks the issues that the protesters are raising through their protests.

This is an example of the media’s limited range of questions, prioritizing the security concerns of a particular social class at the expense of the other. The G20 protests held in London in 2009 is a classic example of this situation.

Despite the protesters raising fundamental issues such as poverty and economic inequality, the media focused on the violent clashes between the protesters and law enforcement officers. Focusing on the Drama of the London Riots:

The London riots of 2011 were a series of riots that broke out in the summer of that year.

The media coverage of the riots focussed on the drama of the event, with images of burning buildings, looting, and rioters engaging in violent activities. This kind of media coverage is said to be entertainment-driven and fuels the public’s desire to consume violent and gory images.

The media’s failure to provide comprehensive coverage of the London riots, including exploring the social and economic factors that led to the riots, is an example of the limited range of questions that the media can ask. Research findings from the London riots suggest that the riots were caused by economic inequalities and youth disenfranchisement, but the media coverage largely ignored this.

Focusing on Economic Growth without Questioning its Benefits:

Media coverage of economic growth often focuses on the capitalist class’s interests, promoting the growth of the economy without questioning its benefits to society. The media’s news values and ownership structure prevent it from questioning the benefits of economic growth and its impact on inequality levels.

A typical example of this is the coverage of business features, which often promote the interests of the capitalist class, ignoring the devastating effects of economic growth on the working class. The Spirit Level, a book that explores the inequality levels caused by economic growth, was largely ignored by the media, showing the media’s inability to question the benefits of economic growth.

Conclusion:

Agenda setting is a crucial process in the media’s ability to influence public opinion. However, the limited range of questions asked by the media and Marxist analysis of agenda setting highlight the media’s inability to represent the broader interests of society.

Based on the examples provided, it is evident that the media’s interests and power structure influence its ability to represent society’s interests comprehensively. Therefore, it is crucial for the media to move beyond its interests and recognize its responsibility in addressing pressing social issues.

Marginalisation of Alternative Perspectives:

The media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion and public discourse. However, the media’s representation of issues is often biased towards elite world views and dominant perspectives that reflect the interests of the powerful.

This has led to the marginalisation of alternative perspectives, further entrenching inequality in society. In this addition, we explore the concept of marginalisation of alternative perspectives and the media’s role in reinforcing dominant world views.

Further, we provide a Marxist perspective on the media’s role in society and its impact on inequality. News Values and Agenda Setting Reinforce Dominant World Views:

News values are the criteria used by the media to decide what news is worthy of attention, emphasis, and coverage.

These values reflect the interests of the media, and they are instrumental in determining the agenda that the media presents to the public. News values can, therefore, reinforce dominant world views that reflect the interests of the powerful while marginalising alternative perspectives.

For instance, the media may consider stories on the lifestyles of the rich and famous as more important compared to stories on the plight of the poor. This gives the impression that elite world views are normal, while poverty and marginalisation are exceptional.

The media’s news values and agenda setting, therefore, construct a representation of the world that reflects the interests of the powerful while marginalising alternative perspectives. Marxist Perspective on the Media’s Role in Society:

Marxist analysis of the media presents a critical account of the media’s role in society.

According to Marxist perspective, the media is an apparatus of control that reinforces power structures and ideologies that reflect the interests of the powerful. Marxist theory argues that the media’s ownership and control structures determine what stories are selected and how they are presented to the public.

The media’s ownership structures and decision-making processes, therefore, reflect the interests of the dominant classes, regularly promoting a capitalist agenda that reinforces inequality. Marxist theorists suggest that the media reproduces the ideologies of the powerful by making their perspectives appear natural and normal, while marginalising alternative perspectives.

Control, Power Structures, Ideology, and Inequality:

The media’s representation of issues is influenced by the control, power structures, and ideology that reflect the interests of the powerful. The media is said to be controlled through factors such as ownership, financing, political affiliations, and interlocking directorates, which all work together to reinforce the interests of the powerful.

Through its representation of issues and dominant world views, the media reproduces and reinforces the dominant ideology, which reflects the interests of the powerful. The media’s representation of issues, therefore, has a significant impact on inequality levels in society.

It marginalises alternative perspectives, contributing to the invisibility of certain social and economic issues, further entrenching inequality and perpetuating existing social hierarchies. Examples of Marginalisation of Alternative Perspectives:

The media’s marginalisation of alternative perspectives is evident in the way it represents social and political issues.

The media often reinforces dominant world views, reflecting the interests of the powerful while marginalising alternative perspectives. Examples of this include the media’s coverage of issues such as poverty, social exclusion, migration, and race.

Media representation of poverty often focuses on individual failure as opposed to systemic issues, further stigmatising the poor and reinforcing stereotypes. The media’s coverage of social exclusion often overlooks issues such as housing, health, and education, perpetuating systemic inequalities that contribute to social exclusion.

Similarly, the media’s representation of migration and race often focuses on negative stereotypes, stigmatising and further marginalising these groups. Conclusion:

Marginalisation of alternative perspectives is a significant concern in society.

The media’s representation of issues reinforces dominant world views, reflecting the interests of the powerful while marginalising alternative perspectives. Through its control, power structures, and ideologies, the media constructs a representation of the world that perpetuates inequality and further marginalises those who experience poverty, social exclusion, migration, race and other forms of marginalisation.

Therefore, it is essential for the media to recognise its role in marginalisation and work towards fair and balanced representation of social and economic issues. In conclusion, this article has highlighted the critical role of the media in shaping public opinion and discourse.

Through agenda setting and the media’s representation of issues, dominant world views are reinforced, and alternative perspectives are marginalised, perpetuating inequality in society. The media’s ownership and decision-making processes, therefore, reflect the interests of the dominant classes, regularly promoting a capitalist agenda that reinforces societal power structures.

It is crucial for the media to recognise its role in marginalisation and work towards fair and balanced representation of social and economic issues, and confront its limitations in exploring all perspectives. By doing so, the media can become a powerful tool for enhancing social justice and overcoming inequality in society.

FAQs:

Q: What is agenda setting? A: Agenda setting is a process by which the media determines what issues will be considered important in the public domain.

Q: Why is there a limited range of questions asked by the media? A: The media’s interests and power structure often result in a limited range of questions it can ask, depending on news values and ideological control.

Q: What is Marxist analysis of the media? A: Marxist analysis of the media presents a critical account of the media’s role in society, arguing that the media reinforces power structures and ideologies that reflect the interests of the powerful.

Q: How does the media marginalise alternative perspectives? A: The media’s representation of issues can marginalise alternative perspectives by reinforcing dominant world views that reflect the interests of the powerful.

Q: What impact does the media have on inequality levels in society? A: The media’s representation of issues and dominant world views has a significant impact on inequality levels in society, marginalising certain social and economic issues while perpetuating existing hierarchies.

Q: What can the media do to overcome marginalisation? A: The media can work towards fair and balanced representation of social and economic issues, confronting its limitations in exploring all perspectives and recognising the role it plays in perpetuating inequality in society.

Popular Posts