Just Sociology

Title: Understanding Material and Cultural Deprivation: Gender Differences in Education

Material and cultural deprivation are two concepts used in social sciences that refer to the lack of access to resources that are necessary for a person to live a fulfilling life. Material deprivation refers to the inability to access and afford basic necessities like adequate housing, nutrition, and health care.

On the other hand, cultural deprivation refers to the lack of access to the resources necessary for one to acquire knowledge, skills, and values that are essential for success in modern societies. This article will discuss the two concepts of material and cultural deprivation and their subtopics.

Material Deprivation

Material deprivation is an economic concept that refers to a lack of resources needed to meet basic needs. People who are materially deprived lack the necessary resources to maintain an adequate standard of living.

There are two subtopics associated with material deprivation, which are the lack of adequate housing and poor diets and health.

Lack of Adequate Housing

Living in overcrowded homes with no private study space is one of the significant effects of a lack of adequate housing. Children from such households find it difficult to study and complete homework, which inevitably leads to a lack of academic success.

Overcrowding also poses health risks to families as it can lead to the spread of diseases like tuberculosis, meningitis, and respiratory infections.

Poor Diets and Health

Material deprivation also manifests through poor diets and health. When people do not have access to quality and nutritious foods, it leads to low nutritional content in their diets, which can result in a variety of chronic health conditions.

Such conditions can include malnutrition, obesity, cardiovascular diseases, and other chronic diseases.

Cultural Deprivation

Cultural deprivation is a concept that refers to a lack of access to the resources necessary for one to acquire knowledge, skills, and values that are essential for success in modern societies. There are two subtopics associated with cultural deprivation, which are immediate gratification and fatalism.

Immediate Gratification

Immediate gratification is a phenomenon observed predominantly amongst working-class families, which may lead to underachievement in both education and employment opportunities. Children who grow up in such environments are usually from socio-economic backgrounds where they have learned that earning money is essential for their survival.

Therefore, they value working over studying, which results in underachievement. This is because when they start working, they get the impression that they can earn enough to suffice for their basic needs and thus do not prioritize education without realizing that education is essential to a better life.

Fatalism

Fatalism is the idea that an individual has no control over their destiny and that their fate is predetermined by external factors. This concept is typically related to working-class communities that do not see any point in trying to improve their lives.

Their lack of hope and ambition makes them more likely to accept their current situation rather than seek growth opportunities. As a result, they may end up underachieving in educational and employment opportunities that may arise.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both material and cultural deprivation are concepts that are significant factors in inequality within modern societies. Material deprivation can lead to a lack of access to basic resources necessary for optimal living conditions, such as housing and healthcare.

Cultural deprivation, on the other hand, can lead to barriers in the acquisition of knowledge, skills, and values that are necessary for success in modern societies. Understanding these concepts is essential in designing policies and interventions that can help reduce inequality and improve social mobility.

Gender Differences in AchievementGender differences in achievement are a topic of interest in educational psychology. Girls have consistently demonstrated better academic achievements than boys in recent years.

The reasons behind this gender gap are multifaceted, and several theories have emerged to explain the phenomenon. This section will delve into three subtopics that have been explored in the literature: the introduction of coursework, changes in family structure, and changes in the labor market.of Coursework

The introduction of coursework in educational curricula has been cited as one reason for girls’ better academic achievement.

Coursework is work that is done during the course of a class period and not sent home to complete. Studies have demonstrated that girls are generally more organized, meticulous, and persistent than their male counterparts.

These traits make them well-suited to succeed in coursework, where continuous effort and attention to detail are necessary for success. Girls tend to be motivated by the challenge of coursework, which they perceive as an opportunity to demonstrate their abilities.

They also tend to be more methodical in their approach, working consistently throughout the year, which can contribute to their better academic performance.

Changes in Family Structure

Another reason that has been suggested for girls’ higher academic performance is the changes in family structures. The increase in the number of working mothers in the labor market has provided girls with an incentive to pursue higher qualifications, as it has become more acceptable for mothers to work full-time.

Consequently, girls can now be motivated by their mothers’ career success and role models, reinforcing the value of education as a means of realizing their dreams. The increase in single-parent families, where mothers are the primary caregivers and providers, has also pushed girls towards the pursuit of higher qualifications.

In these families, girls are more likely to hold responsibilities and assume a role similar to that of adult women, which can give them a sense of maturity and independence. These characteristics can also contribute to the better academic performance of girls, as they value and take full advantage of the opportunities presented to them through education.

Changes in Labor Market

Changes in the labor market also play a significant role in girls’ improved academic performance. The labor market has become increasingly more competitive, and employers now demand higher qualifications from job applicants.

Girls view education as an opportunity to achieve economic independence, which has motivated them to pursue higher qualifications. Furthermore, they perceive education as a means of realizing their career aspirations, which have become better represented by women in recent years.

Girls also have greater access to role models who have succeeded in non-traditional female careers, such as in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. This has made girls more open to pursuing studies in these fields, where they are still underrepresented.

Consequently, girls are more likely to value education as a means of achieving their career potential. Gender Differences in Subject ChoiceGender differences in subject choice refer to the study of why girls and boys tend to select different subjects at school.

Generally, girls and boys tend to choose subjects that are traditionally labeled as being gender-specific. For instance, boys tend to choose physical sciences and mathematics, while girls opt for languages and social sciences.

This section will look at three subtopics that have been explored in the literature: sexist stereotypes of teachers, the unsuitability of the teaching approach in science subjects, and socialization and parental influence.

Sexist Stereotypes of Teachers

Teachers’ stereotype of gender differences in ability can lead to girls struggling in their studies. In many cases, teachers are not aware of their bias or the negative impact it can have on girls’ academic achievements.

Research has shown that teachers frequently underestimate girls’ potential in mathematics and science subjects, leading to them receiving lower grades and less encouragement to pursue those subjects. Furthermore, teachers are often instructed to encourage male students into traditionally masculine subjects, including STEM fields.

This instruction reinforces stereotypical gender roles and perpetuates the notion that women are less capable in these fields. The consequences of such stereotypes can lead to girls doubting their abilities and opting for less challenging subjects where they are perceived to be more suitable.

Science Taught in a Male Way

Science classes frequently use masculine examples, such as cars and rockets, which can intimidate girls and put them off from pursuing these subjects further. Such teaching approaches reinforce the notion that science is for boys, while girls are better suited to other subjects.

Science classes also tend to favor boys in terms of teaching methods, such as practical work, which is geared towards their interests. Girls, on the other hand, are generally more interested in discussions and theory but are disadvantaged by teaching methods that are not aligned with their learning style.

This difference in teaching approach can also influence girls negatively and reinforce gender roles and stereotypes about what subjects are suitable for each gender.

Socialization and Parental Influence

Parents are major socialization agents that influence their children’s subject choice. Parents often influence their children’s subject selection consciously, through direct guidance, or indirectly through their actions and beliefs.

Parents tend to offer technical toys, for instance, robots, to boys in contrast with girls, who frequently receive items such as dolls or cooking sets. Additionally, parents tend to have a more significant influence on girls’ subject choice due to the lack of female science teachers in schools.

Female teachers are crucial role models who can provide girls with a positive identity as to who women in math and science could be. Without female teachers, girls lack adequate representation and can find themselves unable to imagine themselves in such fields.

Conclusion

To summarize, gender differences in achievement and subject choice are complex phenomena that are still the focus of many studies in educational psychology. The evidence demonstrates that girls perform better academically in terms of both academic achievement and subject choice.

The reasons for these differences are multifaceted, including changes in family structures, the labor market, sexist teaching stereotypes in schools, inappropriate teaching approaches in science subjects, and parental influence. Ensuring that girls have equal access to educational opportunities and encouraging them to pursue any subject or career they desire can help break down such stereotypes and address the gender gap in educational outcomes.

In conclusion, material and cultural deprivation are significant factors in inequality within modern societies, and gender differences in achievement and subject choice are phenomena that require attention within educational psychology. Material deprivation can lead to a lack of access to basic resources necessary for optimal living conditions, while cultural deprivation can lead to barriers in the acquisition of knowledge, skills, and values that are necessary for success in modern societies.

The evidence demonstrates that girls perform better academically in terms of both academic achievement and subject choice. However, it is essential to address the underlying factors that contribute to the gender gap in educational outcomes to create equal opportunities for all students.

Through education policies, support systems, and a shift in societal norms, we can work to break down stereotypes and promote equity in education. FAQs:

1.

What is material deprivation, and how does it impact educational outcomes? Material deprivation is a lack of access to resources needed to meet basic needs, such as adequate housing, nutrition, and healthcare, and can lead to poor academic performance and health problems.

2. What is cultural deprivation, and how does it impact educational outcomes?

Cultural deprivation refers to a lack of access to resources necessary for one to acquire knowledge, skills, and values essential for success in modern societies, leading to barriers to academic achievement. 3.

Why do girls tend to outperform boys academically? The evidence suggests that changes in family structures and the labor market, the introduction of coursework, and better role models have inspired girls to pursue higher qualifications, leading to better academic performance.

4. Why do girls and boys tend to choose different subjects at school?

Gender stereotypes perpetuated through teaching approaches and socialization can lead to girls and boys choosing subjects that are traditionally labeled as gender-specific.

Popular Posts