Just Sociology

Unconventional Experiments: Exploring New Perspectives on Human Behavior

Unusual and interesting experiments push the boundaries of scientific inquiry, delving into topics that may seem bizarre or unrelated to traditional research areas. Despite their seemingly unconventional nature, these endeavors often provide unique insights into the human psyche, social dynamics, and decision-making processes.

This article will explore six experimental studies that challenge conventional norms and reveal new perspectives on human behavior. The Circle was a social media experiment that involved contestants living in an apartment complex, interacting only through a bespoke platform that allowed them to present themselves under a variety of identities.

Participants could decide to “block” or “rate” each other, leading to the exclusion of certain members and increased popularity for others. This experiment highlighted the influence of social media on our sense of self and identity, as well as the impact of external stimuli on our self-perception and socialization.

Researchers noted that the platform’s anonymity and lack of face-to-face interaction contributed to more discriminatory and harmful behavior towards others. The Twinstitute investigated the effects of external stimuli on identical twins, who underwent separate experiments while connected to various monitoring devices.

The results revealed the influence of environmental factors on twins’ performance and concentration levels, indicating that even genetically identical individuals can display significant variations in their response to external stimuli. The study also shed light on the inherent limitations of monitoring devices in capturing the full range of cognitive and physiological processes.

Sleep deprivation effects were examined by asking participants to rate their attractiveness, health, and trustworthiness based on photos taken before and after 48 hours without sleep. The results found that sleep-deprived individuals were perceived as less attractive, less healthy, and less trustworthy by their peers, who were unaware of their sleep-deprived state.

This study suggests that getting sufficient sleep is a crucial component of maintaining a healthy and attractive appearance, as well as ensuring adequate cognitive functioning and social perception. Female competence in science was evaluated by asking science professors to evaluate the competency and hireability of a hypothetical undergraduate student based on their CVs. The resumes varied only in the names of the applicants, with half being male and half being female.

The results showed a significant gender bias, with male applicants rated as more competent and hireable than their female counterparts, despite the resumes being identical. The study also highlighted the importance of mentoring and role models in promoting gender equality in the scientific community.

Blind auditions for orchestras were introduced in response to sex-biased hiring practices that favored male musicians over equally qualified female musicians. By implementing blind auditions, where judges could only evaluate auditionees based on their performance and not their gender or appearance, the advancement probabilities of women increased significantly.

This study illustrates how unconscious biases can be overcome through structural interventions that prioritize merit-based evaluations over other factors. The Marshmallow Test studied the ability of children to defer gratification, which is widely purported to correlate with higher quality of life in later years.

Participants were asked to choose between immediate gratification (eating one marshmallow) or waiting for several minutes without eating any to receive a higher reward (two marshmallows). The results showed that children who deferred gratification had better social and academic outcomes later in life, while those who failed to do so displayed a range of negative outcomes, including lower academic achievement and less success in personal relationships.

The study also highlighted the importance of self-control in achieving long-term goals. While these experiments may seem quirky or unconventional, they reveal important insights into the complexities of human behavior and decision-making processes.

They also reveal how societal norms and biases can influence our perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors, highlighting the crucial role of structural interventions and conscious efforts to overcome these limitations. By exploring these and other intriguing experimental studies, we can gain a deeper understanding of the fundamental nature of human behavior and its implications for various aspects of our lives.

The Twinstitute Experiment

The Twinstitute was a unique research study conducted by BBC television network that featured identical twins participating in various experiments under different circumstances, all while being monitored with an array of devices. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the extent of impact that external stimuli have on the performance and physiological responses of identical twins.

The study design allowed for a controlled environment where environmental factors could be manipulated and different types of stimuli could be introduced to the twins. Procedures in the Twinstitute involved a series of experiments, each aimed at examining the impact of different stimuli on the performance of identical twins.

The twins were subjected to different conditions, and the researchers measured their responses through various physiological and cognitive measures. For instance, one experiment examined the twins’ intelligence by giving them a written IQ test.

One twin was allowed to use their mobile phone while the other was not. The aim of the experiment was to determine if the use of mobile phones negatively affected intelligence levels.

Interestingly, the results showed that the mobile phone had no negative impact on the twin’s intelligence during the test. An interesting example of this experiment was an exercise in which participants had to memorize a complex list of numbers for a period of several minutes.

During this task, one of the twins was asked to play an interactive mobile game on their phone while the other twin had to perform the same task without any external stimulus. The results found that the twin who did not play the mobile game had better focus and was able to remember more numbers than their counterpart who played the mobile game.

The study highlights how external stimuli can impact cognitive processes such as memory and focus, even in genetically identical individuals. The Twinstitute was designed with several control measures to ensure that the results were reliable and accurate.

One such control measure was the randomized assignment of each twin to a different stimulus or condition, as well as restricting communication between the twins during the experiment. Additionally, the use of monitoring devices such as heart rate monitors and EEG machines ensured that researchers could gauge the physiological responses of the twins to each stimulus.

The Twinstitute experiment has contributed to our understanding of how environmental factors impact gene expression and the cognitive processes of identical twins. By demonstrating the influence of external stimuli on identical twins’ cognitive processes, researchers can better understand the role of environmental factors in shaping human behavior and cognition.

The Effects of Sleep Deprivation

Sleep deprivation has been an area of interest for researchers due to its negative impact on individuals’ cognitive and physiological well-being. One hypothesis regarding sleep deprivation suggests that it decreases our desire for socialization.

Interestingly, studies have found that sleep-deprived individuals are perceived as less attractive, less healthy, and less trustworthy, regardless of whether or not their sleep-deprivation is known. This suggests that quality sleep plays a vital role in our appearance, social behavior, and overall trustworthiness.

The study design of sleep deprivation effects involved participants spending 48-hours without sleep, following which they were asked to rate their own attractiveness, health, and trustworthiness. Participants had photographs taken before and after the sleep deprivation period, which would then be rated by a group of independent raters, who were blind to the sleep deprivation status of the participants.

The results of the study revealed that sleep-deprived participants were rated as significantly less attractive, healthy, and trustworthy compared to their non-sleep-deprived version. The study participants’ ratings of themselves revealed that they also believed they were less attractive, less healthy, and less trustworthy after 48-hours of continuous wakefulness.

One possible explanation for these results could be the role of sleep in rejuvenating and repairing our body tissues, contributing to overall well-being and attractive appearance. Studies suggest that sleep deprivation is associated with increased inflammation in the body, which could lead to negative health outcomes over time.

Additionally, sleep deprivation is known to impact mood, behavior, and decision-making processes, which can contribute to unfavorable perceptions of one’s trustworthiness. In conclusion, sleep deprivation has significant negative effects on an individual’s social perception, physical appearance, and overall health.

The study design adopted by researchers allows for a thorough understanding of the role of quality sleep in maintaining physical and social well-being, which could potentially inform social policies regarding sleep regulation.

Female Competence in Science Experiment


Female Competence in Science Experiment aimed to investigate whether the gender bias exists in science professors’ hiring decisions. The experiment examined the potential for gender-based discrimination during the processes of hiring and promoting science professors.

Researchers wanted to determine whether science professors based their evaluations on the applicants’ competency, regardless of their gender. The experiment’s design involved the distribution of identical application materials to a sample of science professors.

The only difference in the materials was the name of the candidate, reflecting their gender. By using identical application materials, the researchers were able to reduce the possibility that the differences in the raters’ evaluations were due to actual differences in the applicants’ qualifications.

The results of the experiment were striking, revealing the presence of gender bias in the evaluation procedures of male and female professors. Male and female scientists alike rated male applicants as being more competent and, consequently, more hirable and worth mentoring.

The most troubling aspect of the outcome of the study was the perception of female candidates as being less hireable, even by women professors. These results speak to the larger societal problem of implicit biases and suggest that addressing these biases is a necessary solution to promote gender parity in the field of science.

Blind Auditions for Orchestras Experiment

The Blind Auditions experiment was developed to address the issue of underrepresented women in symphony orchestras. Renowned conductors of the Boston Symphony Orchestra initiated the experiment to minimize the impact of bias on orchestral hiring decisions.

The focus of the experiment was to determine whether hearing the sex of the candidate impacted the rater’s decision-making during the audition. The study design involved holding non-blind auditions and blind auditions to compare the outcomes of the two methods of auditioning.

During the non-blind auditions, the candidates’ sex was made known to the raters. In contrast, during the blind auditions, the raters were unaware of the sex of the candidates.

Raters were asked to evaluate candidates based solely on their musical ability and not on factors such as age, race, or sex. The results of the study found that when auditions were held under non-blind conditions, females had lower chances of advancing to the next round.

However, when blind auditions were conducted, advancing probabilities of women increased significantly. The implementation of blind auditions decreased the likelihood of sex-biased hiring practices and eradicated the biases previously favored male musicians over equally qualified female musicians.

The findings of the study emphasize the importance of conscious efforts towards creating systems that prioritize evaluation-based on merit over biases. The practice of blind auditions must be implemented more broadly and in other sectors to overcome the gender disparity in recruitment and promotion practiced by organizations.

In conclusion, the Female Competence in Science and Blind Auditions for Orchestras experiments have provided significant insight into the impact of biases during hiring procedures. The experiments reveal how the implementation of a structural intervention such as blind auditions during recruitment can be an efficient approach towards eliminating gender bias.

Though there is a long way ahead to overcome age-old prejudices and biases, research like this is the initial step towards bringing about a more equitable society.

The Marshmallow Test Experiment

The Marshmallow Test is a classic study conducted in the late 1960s by Walter Mischel at Stanford University, which aimed to investigate the effect of delayed gratification on children’s success in later life. The study involved giving children the option to eat a single marshmallow immediately or wait for a short period, around 15 minutes, to receive two instead.

This test aimed to determine whether children who defer gratification have greater willpower, better control over their emotions, and accomplish an overall better quality of life in the future. The objective of the Marshmallow Test was to examine how the ability to employ cognitive delay of gratification might predict important life outcomes.

The researchers theorized that the children who had the cognitive ability to perceive a peer of long-term goals and exert self-restraint over an immediate desire would be more successful in life, contributing to a better overall quality of life. The procedures of the Marshmallow Test experiment involved presenting children aged between 3 to 5 years with a marshmallow on a plate, telling them that they could have the marshmallow immediately or wait until the researcher returned, at which time, they would receive an additional marshmallow.

The marshmallow’s placement and distance from the child were changed to enhance the difficulty of waiting. Consequently, some children were more successful in controlling their temptation than others.

The outcomes of the Marshmallow Test found that the children who were successful at delaying their gratification went on to show higher levels of maturity, focus, and self-control later in life. They also displayed better (according to self-report, academic and parent report) outcomes in academics in later life, scored higher in standardized tests, had better social and emotional regulation, were less likely to suffer from obesity, and subsequently enjoyed better overall life outcomes.

The Marshmallow Test underlined the importance of self-control and willpower in achieving personal goals and establishing a sound foundation for future growth. Moreover, the study highlighted the importance of teaching skills to increase self-control in young children, which could lead to better life outcomes.

In conclusion, the Marshmallow Test experiment has made significant contributions to our understanding of human behavior, impulse control, and self-control. Furthermore, the study’s outcomes suggest that increasing cognitive skills of delay of gratification in young children may lead to better life outcomes regarding academic achievements and overall well-being.

The research conducted can help shape educational policies to improve the well-being of children, paving the way for future generations of healthy and successful individuals. In summary, these six unusual and interesting experiments provide significant insight into human behavior and societal norms.

The experiments have highlighted the influence of social media on self-identity, the impact of external stimuli on cognitive processes, the importance of sleep for social perception and physiological well-being, the presence of gender bias in science research, the significance of structural interventions to overcome biases in recruitment and the importance of self-control and willpower in achieving long-term goals. By exploring these and other intriguing experimental studies, we can gain a deeper understanding of the fundamental nature of human behavior and its implications for various aspects of our lives.


1. What was The Circle experiment designed to reveal?

The Circle experiment aimed to investigate the influence of social media on people’s sense of self-identity and discern external stimuli’s impact on socialization and discriminatory behavior. 2.

What stimuli were used in The Twinstitute experiment? The Twinstitute experiment used multiple stimuli to measure cognitive and physiological responses to different circumstances, including mobile phones and interactive mobile games.

3. What did the Sleep Deprivation Effects study reveal?

The Sleep Deprivation Effects study found that sleep-deprived individuals were perceived as less attractive, less healthy, and less trustworthy, emphasizing the importance of quality sleep in maintaining physical and social well-being. 4.

What was examined in the

Female Competence in Science Experiment? The

Female Competence in Science Experiment aimed to investigate whether gender-based discrimination exists during science professors’ hiring and evaluations.

5. What was the

Blind Auditions for Orchestras Experiment conducted to address?


Blind Auditions for Orchestras Experiment was designed to address sex-biased hiring practices and increase the probability of women advancing in symphony orchestras. 6.

What did The Marshmallow Test experiment aim to determine? The Marshmallow Test experiment aimed to investigate whether delayed gratification leads to long-term success in life, establishing the importance of self-control and willpower in achieving personal goals.

Popular Posts