Just Sociology

Unpacking the Scottish Exam Results Controversy: Examining Inequality Complexity and Reform

The Scottish exam results published in August 2020 caused widespread controversy and uproar across the country. The Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) lowered teacher predicted grades for tens of thousands of pupils, resulting in a significant decrease in overall pass rates.

This decision was taken due to the unprecedented circumstances surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. This article explores the issue of Scottish exam results and presents two subtopics for discussion.

Teacher predicted grades lowered by qualifications authority

The Scottish Qualifications Authority has the responsibility for ensuring that qualifications awarded in Scotland are reliable and credible. In light of the pandemic, the SQA reviewed the teachers predicted grades to determine the final results for students.

The SQA decided to reduce the number of pupils achieving the highest grades due to a concern that the predicted grades were too optimistic. This decision was met with disappointment and anger from pupils, parents, and teachers who believed that the pupils had been unfairly downgraded, and their achievements belittled.

The controversy forced the Scottish government to backtrack and allowed pupils to use their teacher predicted grades. However, the damage had already been done, and the reputation of Scottish education has been severely undermined.

Poor Scottish pupils have had their teacher predicted grades lowered more than rich pupils

One of the most significant criticisms of the SQA’s decision is that downgraded predicted grades disproportionately affected disadvantaged pupils. There is evidence that pupils from low-income families had their predicted grades downgraded more than their richer peers.

Studies have shown that children living in more deprived areas have lower academic attainment levels than children from more affluent areas. The SQA’s decision has further perpetuated and exacerbated the invidious cycle of inequality.

The Scottish Government has been urged to investigate whether the downgrading of pupils’ results based on their postcode is discrimination, and if so, it is a flagrant violation of their human rights. Comparison of previous year’s results with teacher predicted grades and the actual downward-adjusted grades

The Scottish exam results are usually predicted based on the performance of the students in previous years.

However, given the long-term closure in schools due to COVID-19, the SQA couldn’t use a comparable measure to assess pupil attainment. As a result, teacher predicted grades were used to award grades.

However, the SQA quickly discovered that the estimates submitted by teachers were significantly higher than the actual performance of students. When the SQA stood by their decision to reduce teacher predictions, pupils and their families reacted with disbelief and fury.

Many students lost out on university places, apprenticeships, or vocational training because of the downgraded marks. A task force was set up to review the handling of the exam results and how the government can learn from this monumental mistake.

Grossly inflated predicted grades by teachers

Another significant issue with the Scottish exam results was the manner in which teacher predicted grades were inflated. It was suggested that some teachers deliberately overestimated pupils’ grades to put them in the best possible position.

Consequently, there was a systemic inflation of results, with a significant proportion of students predicted to achieve top grades. This approach to expected grades was rationalized by the usual practice of moderation by the SQA.

The SQA would usually adjust results to fit the statistical median, so some schools felt that they were following suit by raising their pupils grades. However, the SQA argued that the high number of predicted top grades this year should have been a red flag that the predictions were not accurate.

Conclusion:

The issue of Scottish exam results in 2020 is a complex one with far-reaching implications for the future of education in Scotland. The controversy has highlighted the pervasive issue of educational inequality and the need for urgent reform.

There is a need to establish a fair and transparent system of assessment that accounts for the unprecedented circumstances of a pandemic. It is vital that the Scottish government and the educational establishment work together to find a comprehensive and just solution.

Exam Process

Exaggerated results of poorest students

The Scottish exam results controversy has highlighted a significant issue regarding the accuracy and fairness of the examination process. Whilst it is clear that the statistical moderation process by the SQA was flawed, it has also come to light that the results of the poorest students were exaggerated.

Studies have shown that students from deprived backgrounds were more likely to have their grades increased, and the extent of the increase was higher than average. This finding raises questions about the objectivity and fairness of the examination process, further exacerbating existing educational inequality issues in Scotland.

Many experts have argued that the exam process needs to be reviewed and that a more consistent and objective approach should be taken. The Scottish government has an obligation to ensure that every student has an equal opportunity to succeed, regardless of socioeconomic background.

This can only be achieved by introducing a more transparent and equitable examination process.

Business as usual in exams

The Scottish exam results scandal has also highlighted the “business as usual” approach in education in the UK. Critics argue that the education system continues to reward certain groups and neglect others, perpetuating inequality and injustice.

This issue is compounded by the fact that educational institutions continue to prize academic qualifications over practical skills and vocational training, meaning that many students are excluded from opportunities due to their exam results. There has been an increasing awareness of the limitations of the current educational system, which emphasizes rote learning and standardized testing.

Many experts have argued for a more holistic approach to education, one that emphasizes problem-solving, critical thinking, and creativity. The Scottish exam results fiasco provides an opportunity to reflect on the wider issues of educational inequality and inadequacy and instigate meaningful reform.

Student Performance

Students did better than average

Despite the controversy surrounding the Scottish exam results, one positive outcome was the overall improvement in student performance. Results showed that the pass rates for Highers and Advanced Highers both increased compared to the previous year, with 89.2% of Higher passes and 93.1% of Advanced Higher passes being successful.

Despite the significant decrease in pass rates due to the moderation process and the subsequent backlash, overall student performance was better than the previous year. This improvement in student performance indicates that pupils are capable of achieving excellent examination results, which raises a question about the fairness of the exam system.

If students can achieve high results independently of the ongoing education system, it reinforces the need to reform the exam process and make it more transparent and equitable.

Poor students show dramatic improvement

One of the most striking revelations that emerged from the Scottish exam results controversy was the significant improvement in the results of disadvantaged students. The SQA statistics showed that pupils living in the most deprived areas of Scotland achieved almost 10% more Highers, equivalent to university entrance qualifications, than last year.

This dramatic improvement suggests that there is a clear correlation between access to resources, such as supportive teachers, and improved student performance. However, it was later revealed that the SQA had downgraded 124,000 teacher predicted grades, the majority of which were for pupils from low-income families, according to the Times Educational Supplement.

This downgrading is believed to have affected the university aspirations of around 5,000 pupils from the poorest background, with many unable to secure places at their desired institutions. Conclusion:

The Scottish exam results fiasco has highlighted the ongoing issue of educational inequality and inadequacy within Scotlands education system.

The controversy revealed flaws in the exam process, including the moderation of results and the downgrading of teacher predicted grades, that perpetuate existing educational inequality issues. However, it also revealed improvements in student performance and highlighted the need for a more holistic approach to education.

The Scottish government and educational institutions have a duty to address these issues and implement lasting and meaningful reforms that ensure every student has equal opportunities to succeed.

Media Coverage

Likely misleading narrative

The media played a crucial role in highlighting the Scottish exam results controversy, but their coverage has been criticized for presenting a misleading narrative. Many media outlets framed the issue as a struggle between the Scottish government and teachers’ unions, presenting it as a political issue rather than an education issue.

They also frequently used the term “downgrading,” which was misleading since it implied that student grades were lowered from their predicted grades rather than moderated. This portrayal of the issue significantly contributed to the negative perception of Scotland’s education system.

Moreover, some media coverage focused solely on individual students who had been affected by the downgrading process, rather than examining the larger issue of educational inequality. This approach furthered the public perception that the Scottish exam results were a mere political controversy rather than a broader issue of social justice.

Easy to find individual axes to grind against overall trend

The media coverage of the Scottish exam results also highlighted how easy it is to find individual axes to grind against the larger trend. While there is no denying that many students suffered undoubtedly unfair downgrading, the media’s focus on individual cases rather than wider issues led to a distorted and incomplete view of the controversy.

For example, some news outlets highlighted the frustration experienced by students who missed out on places at universities, while ignoring the underlying issue of educational inequality that made it harder for disadvantaged students to secure higher education opportunities. This individualistic and myopic focus presents an incomplete story that neglects efforts to address systemic issues in Scotland’s education system.

Conclusion:

The media’s coverage of the Scottish exam results controversy has highlighted the importance of responsible journalism and the perils of presenting an incomplete or misleading narrative. Coverage that focuses solely on individual cases or political conflicts ignores the deeper issues of equality and fairness in education.

The Scottish government and educational institutions must work towards real change in the education system by addressing these issues and ensuring that every student has access to quality education, no matter their background or postcode. Furthermore, the media must take responsibility by providing a comprehensive and objective account of events, rather than selectively highlighting individual cases that perpetuate the social and educational inequalities that the controversy exposed.

In conclusion, the Scottish exam results controversy has highlighted the complex issues of educational inequality and inadequacy in Scotland’s education system. The exam moderation process, downgrading of teacher predicted grades, and the media’s misleading narrative have all contributed to a public perception of Scotland’s education system as unfair and flawed.

However, the controversy has also highlighted opportunities for meaningful reform and presented a chance to re-evaluate the focus of education, emphasize problem-solving and critical thinking, and reduce inequality. Addressing these issues requires a concerted effort from the Scottish government, educational institutions, and wider society to ensure every student has equal opportunities to succeed.

FAQs:

Q: How did the downgrading of teacher predicted grades disproportionately affect disadvantaged students? A: Studies have shown that students from low-income backgrounds had their predicted grades downgraded more than their richer peers, exacerbating existing educational inequality issues in Scotland.

Q: Why was the Scottish exam results controversy considered a political issue? A: Some media outlets framed the issue as a political struggle between the Scottish government and teachers’ unions, which contributed to a negative perception of the education system.

Q: How did the media coverage of the Scottish exam results controversy shift the focus away from larger issues? A: The media’s individualistic focus on students who missed out on university places or individual cases neglected the larger issues of educational inequality that made it harder for disadvantaged students to secure higher education opportunities.

Q: What is the significance of the improvement in overall student performance despite the controversy? A: The improvement in student performance highlights the need for a more equitable examination process and raises questions about the fairness of the exam system.

Q: How can Scotland’s education system address issues of inequality and inadequacy? A: Scotland’s education system needs reform to ensure transparency and equity in exam procedures, equitable access for disadvantaged communities, and a more holistic approach to education that emphasizes critical thinking and creativity.

Popular Posts