Just Sociology

War Conflict and Development: Understanding the Complexities and Key Theories

War and conflict have been a part of human history since the beginning of civilization. However, the nature and severity of wars have evolved over time, and it is crucial to understand the key concepts and principles involved in modern-day conflicts.

It requires identifying their root causes, the actors involved, the consequences, and the strategies that lead to a resolution. Therefore, this article aims to explore the definitions of key concepts related to war and conflict and highlight some significant case studies that demonstrate the complex relationships between war and development.

Types of War: War, Civil War, Terrorism, Old Wars, New Wars

At its core, a war is an armed conflict between two or more political communities. War has been classified into several typologies based on factors such as the nature of the actors involved, the duration of the conflict, and the objectives.

Civil war, for instance, is a type of war that occurs within a single state when different factions or groups fight for power, resources or independence. It is characterized by the presence of ethnic or religious differences, political divides, or economic disparities.

Conversely, terrorism refers to a type of political violence that aims to bring about political or social change by instilling fear and panic among civilians. It is often perpetrated by non-state actors who use asymmetric tactics to achieve their goals.

Old wars and new wars are typologies that differentiate wars based on the nature of the actors involved and their strategies. Old wars refer to the conventional wars that occurred during the twentieth century, wherein nation-states used conventional tactics to fight one another.

New wars, on the other hand, are characterized by the involvement of non-state actors, such as militias, terrorist groups, or mercenaries, and the use of asymmetrical warfare tactics that blur the line between soldiers and civilians. These wars are typically fought over control of resources, access to wealth, identity politics, and resistance to the state’s ideology.

Global Shadow Economy: Illegal trade in trafficking or arms, drugs, and diamonds

The global shadow economy refers to the trade in illicit goods and services that bypass regulatory and legal frameworks. This includes the illegal trade in arms, drugs, diamonds, and human trafficking.

This shadow economy operates outside the formal economy, and its activities generate significant revenue, often surpassing those of legal enterprises. The shadow economy is prevalent in conflict zones, where illegal activities fuel armed conflict and promote violence.

For instance, the trade in blood diamonds, which are diamonds mined and sold to finance wars or rebel activities, played a significant role in funding the Sierra Leone and Liberia civil wars. War, Conflict, and Development: Key Case Studies

Several case studies illustrate the complex relationship between war, conflict, and development.

One example is the Rwandan Genocide, which occurred in 1994 and claimed the lives of approximately 800,000 people. The Rwandan genocide was fueled by ethnic tensions and political conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi ethnic groups, which led to mass murder and genocide.

To address the root causes of the genocide, the international community focused on promoting peacebuilding, reconciliation, and development in Rwanda, which led to the country’s steady economic growth and social development. Another example is the Sierra Leone and Liberian civil wars, which lasted from 1991 to 2002.

These wars were characterized by the presence of non-state actors, the exploitation of the country’s natural resources, and the illegal trade in diamonds. The exploitation of these resources fueled conflicts between various factions, and the wars resulted in large-scale human rights abuses and untold suffering.

After the wars, the international community focused on promoting the rule of law, good governance, and sustainable development in Sierra Leone and Liberia. The U.S. War on Iraq, which took place between 2003 and 2011, also illustrates the relationship between war, conflict, and development.

The war, which was fueled by the desire for resources and geopolitical dominance, led to the destabilization of the region, massive human rights violations, and a humanitarian crisis. Iraq’s economy was shattered, and the country has since struggled to achieve sustainable development, despite the ongoing efforts of the international community.

The Syrian civil war, which began in 2011 and rages on today, is another example of the link between war, conflict, and development. The conflict was sparked by political oppression and calls for democratic reform, but it has since devolved into a civil war between different factions, with terrorism also playing a role.

The conflict has led to massive displacement, human rights abuses, and a humanitarian crisis, and it has also had a significant impact on the country’s economy and development.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the relationship between war, conflict, and development is a complex one, and it requires a careful understanding of key concepts, actors, and strategies. The case studies highlighted in this article illustrate the complex and interrelated nature of war and development, and they highlight the need for innovative approaches to conflict resolution, peacebuilding, and sustainable development.

The international community can play a critical role in promoting peace and development in conflict zones, but it requires a long-term, multi-faceted approach that addresses the root causes of conflict and the complex dynamics involved. War, Conflict, and Development: Key Theories

Understanding the root causes of war and conflict requires an examination of the various theories that attempt to explain the complex and interrelated nature of these phenomena.

This section explores several key theories related to war, conflict, and development, including Paul Collier’s five causes of civil war, the bottom billion theory, Noam Chomsky’s critique of U.S. intervention, Naomi Klein’s shock doctrine, David Harvey’s oil theory, modernization theory, dependency theory, and feminism. Paul Collier’s 5 Causes of Civil War

Paul Collier’s theory of five causes of civil war provides an understanding of why some countries are more prone to internal conflict compared to others.

According to Collier, countries that rely on primary product exports, have diasporas, high male unemployment, ethnic conflict or dispersed populations are more susceptible to civil war. For instance, resource-rich countries often suffer from the resource curse phenomenon, where the wealth generated from primary product exports is concentrated in the hands of a few individuals, leading to unequal distribution of wealth that can spur conflict.

Paul Collier’s Bottom Billion Theory

Paul Collier’s bottom billion theory offers insight into the lives of the world’s poorest and most vulnerable populations, and it stresses the need to address poverty to promote development and reduce conflict. The bottom billion are nations that suffer from ethnic conflict, corruption, the resource curse, and other factors that lead to underdevelopment.

Addressing the root causes of poverty and underdevelopment can help mitigate the risk of conflict and promote sustainable development. Noam Chomsky’s Critique of U.S. Intervention

Noam Chomsky is a prominent critic of U.S. foreign policy, particularly the country’s intervention in developing nations.

Chomsky argues that U.S. interventions in developing nations are often motivated by a desire to advance American interests, such as access to resources or geopolitical dominance, rather than a desire to promote democracy or human rights. According to Chomsky, these interventions often lead to destabilization, increased violence, and terrorism.

Naomi Klein’s Shock Doctrine

Naomi Klein’s shock doctrine posits that moments of crisis, whether natural or man-made, provide opportunities for those in power to implement neolibeal policies and reforms under the guise of “shock therapy.” Klein argues that conflicts and resource exploitation often present opportunities for wealthy elites and corporations to create a power vacuum, which they then exploit to impose exploitative economic policies on vulnerable populations. David Harvey’s Oil Theory

David Harvey’s oil theory posits that oil and fossil fuel consumption in developed countries are a significant driver of conflict, particularly in the Global South.

According to Harvey, the oil industry has created enormous wealth for corporations in the developed world, while fueling conflict and violence in resource-rich countries. Furthermore, the consumption patterns of developed nations drive global demand for oil, and therefore, perpetuate the conflicts in resource-rich countries as corporations and states exploit the resources to meet consumer demand.

Modernization Theory

Modernization theory posits that countries undergo development in stages, moving from traditional to modern society, and that conflict decreases as societies become economically developed. Under this theory, economics is the primary driver of development, and wealth creation will inherently lead to peace and stability.

However, critics of modernization theory argue that it does not account for the complexities and nuances of societies, including the inequalities that tend to emerge as countries develop.

Dependency Theory

Dependency theory posits that the Global South’s poverty and underdevelopment is perpetuated by the exploitative relationships between developed nations and less developed countries. According to this theory, developed nations and multinational corporations have historically exploited the resources and labor of less developed countries and continue to do so through oppressive trade practices, economic agreements, and arms sales, perpetuating conflict and inequality.

Feminism

Feminist theory posits that male aggression is a significant contributing factor to conflict and that patriarchal institutions, including governments and arms companies, perpetuate this aggression. Feminist scholars highlight the disproportionate impact of conflict on women, including sexual violence and displacement.

Addressing the root causes of gendered violence and promoting gender equity can mitigate the risk of conflict and promote sustainable development.

Direct and Indirect Effects of War

In addition to the root causes of conflict, it is essential to understand the direct and indirect effects of war on individuals, communities, and nations. Direct effects of war include increased death rates, the destruction of infrastructure, and the displacement of populations.

Death rates can increase due to direct violence, but also due to indirect causes such as disease and starvation that result from the breakdown of infrastructure and social services. Destruction of infrastructure, including hospitals, schools, and water systems, undermines the long-term economic and social stability of communities and can lead to long-term poverty.

Indirect effects of war include the displacement of people, destruction of social fabric, and increased poverty. Individuals and communities that are forced to flee their homes due to conflict and violence can suffer from long-term displacement and trauma, affecting their economic and social wellbeing.

Conflict can also undermine the social fabric of a community, leading to long-term political instability and social disintegration. Finally, conflict can exacerbate poverty and inequality by disrupting trade and economic development, and perpetuating a cycle of violence and political instability.

Ending Conflict as the Primary Development Goal

The cost of conflict to global development is staggering. An estimated $13 trillion is spent on conflict-related activities globally each year, dwarfing the amount spent on aid and development.

As such, prioritizing the ending of conflict, as a key development goal, is critical. In this section, we explore the efforts made by international organizations and governments to end conflict and promote peace, including the

Global Peace Index and the

United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

Global Cost of Conflict: $13 trillion per year

The cost of conflict to global development is immense. In addition to the direct costs of conflict, including military spending and the devastation of infrastructure, conflict has long-term economic and social costs.

These include the destruction of property and investment, the disruption of trade and development, and the displacement of populations. Moreover, conflict can exacerbate poverty and inequality, widens social divides, and hamper efforts to promote sustainable development.

According to the Institute for Economics and Peace, global conflict costs reached a staggering $13 trillion in 2018, with the highest shares due to internal ontributions such as battle deaths and IDPs. This figure is three times the amount of global foreign aid given annually, amounting to a historical high.

Global Peace Index

Measuring the level of peacefulness is the

Global Peace Index (GPI), a metric produced annually by the Institute of Economics and Peace. The GPI measures the level of peacefulness in over 100 countries, based on 23 indicators such as violent crime, political instability, battle deaths, and arms expenditure.

The GPI is a valuable tool for policymakers and decision-makers to identify countries with the greatest need for intervention and support. Moreover, it encourages governments and international organizations to invest in peacebuilding efforts, including conflict prevention, peacekeeping, and post-conflict reconstruction.

The results of the GPI also show that there is a positive correlation between peace and economic prosperity, as peaceful countries are more likely to experience growth, attract investment, and benefit from interconnected global systems. Conversely, countries in conflict see their economies regress, poverty levels increase, and the long-term costs of conflict multiply.

United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

The

United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) also emphasize the need for peace and stability as a critical prerequisite for sustainable development. SDG 16 focuses explicitly on promoting peaceful and inclusive societies, providing access to justice for all, and ensuring effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.

The SDGs recognize that conflict and violence undermine development efforts, hamper economic growth, increase poverty levels and inequality, and exacerbate environmental degradation. Furthermore, the SDGs acknowledge that without peace and stability, development goals will be impossible to achieve.

As such, the SDGs take a holistic approach to development by addressing the root causes of conflict and violence while promoting sustainable development. SDG 16, in particular, recognizes the need for inclusive institutions that govern through transparency, accountability, and participation, as well as adequate access to justice.

Conclusion

In conclusion, addressing the root causes of conflict and violence is critical for sustainable development. Resolving conflict and promoting peace require a multi-faceted approach that addresses the economic, social, and political drivers of conflict.

In addition, decision-makers must prioritize the ending of conflict as a key development goal, investing in conflict prevention, peacebuilding, and post-conflict reconstruction. Furthermore, tools like the GPI and SDGs provide valuable frameworks for policymakers to track progress, identify areas for improvement and design targeted interventions.

Ultimately, prioritizing the ending of conflict will bring incalculable benefits, from the preservation of human life to the promotion of economic growth and the establishment of stable, just, and inclusive societies. In conclusion, understanding the complex nature of war and conflict is essential for promoting sustainable development.

The root causes of conflict can vary from the exploitation of resources to political oppression, economic disparities, and identity politics. International organizations and governments are investing in conflict prevention, peacebuilding, and post-conflict reconstruction to address these issues.

Resolving conflict and promoting peace require a multi-faceted approach that addresses the economic, social, and political drivers of conflict. By prioritizing the ending of conflict as a key development goal, we can mitigate the devastating impact that conflict has on populations, economies, and the environment.

FAQs:

Q: What is the global shadow economy? A: The global shadow economy refers to the trade in illicit goods and services that bypass regulatory and legal frameworks, such as the trade in drugs, arms, and blood diamonds.

Q: What are some direct and indirect effects of war on populations and communities? A: Direct effects of war include increased death rates, the destruction of infrastructure, and the displacement of populations.

Indirect effects of war include the disruption of social fabric, increased poverty, and long-term displacement and trauma. Q: Why is it necessary to prioritize the ending of conflict as a key development goal?

A: The cost of conflict to global development is immense, including direct and indirect costs. Addressing the root causes of conflict and promoting peace require a multi-faceted approach that addresses the economic, social, and political drivers of conflict.

Q: What are some key theories related to war, conflict, and development? A: Key theories include Paul Collier’s five causes of civil war, feminism, dependency theory, modernization theory, and David Harvey’s oil theory.

Q: How can we measure peacefulness? A: The

Global Peace Index (GPI) measures the level of peacefulness in over 100 countries based on indicators such as violent crime, political instability, battle deaths, and arms expenditure.

Popular Posts